BioArt either goes into the cellular
tissue level directly and/or constitutes collaboration with scientists and
scientific imaging.
Joe
Davis, who aims to connect unrelated things, synthesized DNA and inserted it
into genomes of living bacteria. As a bio artist, he used audio microscope to
image particular living cells while simultaneously listening to their greatly
amplified and species-specific micro acoustic signatures. E coli responded to
jazz music by pulsating to stressful sound frequencies. I found this
particularly fascinating because I just watched a video of cells “dancing” rhythmically
to the base of songs in my LS1 class.
![]() |
Outnumbered |
![]() |
(Butterfly wings with holes) |
"In
Outnumbered I portray bacteria in different contexts. Bacteria grown in
petri dishes were photographed, scanned, digitally manipulated, transferred
onto paper and further manipulated," Levy explains. "Then I applied
generative growth algorithms that caused the image to proliferate further. When
happy with the results, I fixed the image on the computer." Ellen K. Levy
presents a perfect intersection of Biotechnology and Art through her use of art
to manipulate science, and vice versa. Her mechanism and manipulation of
material to interact and overlay create BioArt.
Art and Biology are also combined in Marta de Menezes’ work
on butterflies. She altered the butterfly’s wing pattern to simultaneously
create art and life. She artistically changed the biological structure of the
living organism, which quickly disappeared from nature due to evolutionary
processes. Her art was literally alive and had a lifespan – the lifespan of the
butterfly, which would never be seen again after its death. This is a very
symbolic representation of the advancements in BioArt effecting living
organisms and whether that is a good direction. Butterflies undergo
metamorphosis, like BioArt changes, but the holes and inevitable death of the
creature also symbolize ‘holes’ in Menezes’ attempt to change nature. Who are
we to change nature? What is even ours/who are we if 90% of each of us isn’t
actually human – but bacteria?
![]() |
Victimless
Leather
|
Conservative
groups question the use of transgenic technologies and tissue culturing from a
moral standpoint. However, many BioArt projects deal with the manipulation of
cells and not whole organisms. Victimless
Leather creates "an actualized possibility of wearing ‘leather' without killing an
animal”. It raises questions about the exploitation of other living beings and
problematizes the relationship to non-human animals and the
use of animal products in scientific processes. It is part of the Tissue
Culture & Art Project where artists grow victimless, semi-living garments. “This
artistically grown garment confronts people with the moral implications of
wearing parts of dead animals for protective and aesthetic reasons and confronts
notions of relationships with manipulated living systems.”
![]() |
Alba
|
Eduardo
Katz used French scientist’s work as art piece (transgenic art), which he named
Alba. Through zygote microinjection, magnified genetic glowing properties of DNA
were inserted into the rabbit’s fertilized egg cells, which replicated
throughout its body and turned it fluorescent.


![]() |
(Also, hybrid-Pomeranian-Huskies are the cutest hybrid EVER) |
No comments:
Post a Comment